Considering Ungrading

This blog post is my response to a Lesson: Impossible podcast episode with Agent Jessica Zeller where we discuss ungrading, which got me thinking about how this applies to second language acquisition contexts. As you will read below, this is a concept that intrigues me mightily, but I’m still trying to figure out what it would like for me in my classes!

Lafeyette College defines ungrading as “an umbrella term for any assessment that decenters the action of an instructor assigning a summary grade to student work. While there are many ways to do ungrading, instructors generally provide students with formative rather than summative feedback, which may be combined with student self-evaluation and/or peer feedback, as well as dialogue with the student.” It can manifest in a variety of forms, but my understanding is that at the base, it means decoupling assessment from traditional ideas of evaluation and authority. While I’ve heard a lot about ungrading in the past, particularly from my podcasting colleagues Batsheva Frankel of Overthrowing Education and Natalie Vardabasso of EduCrush, as well as an episode on my own podcast, this interview finally made it click for me. I think it’s because Jessica is an associate professor of dance, and when talking about assessing something physical, rather than mental, I am better able to comprehend how ungrading really works. I can imagine how every dancer’s body is different in a way that I can’t see that every student’s intellectual strengths are different.

Personally, from the beginning of my career until now, I went from grading everything, most of it out of 10, to minimal grading accompanied by a lot of student reflection. However, I have yet to take that final step and, as Jessica describes it “turn over the authority of the red pen to students.” She also goes as far as to turn much of the criteria and even the curriculum over to the students. As much as I see the potential, it has been really hard for me to wrap my head around a) me not having the final evaluative say and b) letting students guide the learning outcomes. I was a guest on the BigEDidea Podcast recently, talking about, as usual, incorporating improv into my teaching practice. One of the comments that the host made was that simpler lesson plans are almost always better for student learning than complicated ones.  And I agreed wholeheartedly despite absolutely loving making complicated, detailed lesson plans. Why do I love my multi-step, super-involved lesson plans? I think that it’s based on a sense of control, the feeling that if I can roadmap my students’ learning journey down to the second, then I can make sure that we all get to the pre-programmed destination. But, as Jessica points out, road-mapping the journey means that we never get a chance to explore any interesting things that pop up along the way. She also said something that hit a little too close to home: “The feeling of authority and holding on to authority is something that as individual teachers we need to look at in ourselves.” How can I be saying that the key to improv is to trust students when I am not trusting them in other facets of my teaching? Perhaps I need to think more about what Jessica says about her pedagogy, which is that she “put[s] most of [her] eggs in the basket of trusting students.”?

Image source: https://www.chronicle.com/article/why-to-use-ungrading-when-you-teach-writing

Reflecting on language classes, I think that it’s actually a perfect place for ungrading. Like in the dance classes Jessica describes, students have a pretty clear feeling of improvement: they can speak and write with more detail, more fluidly, more accuracy, etc. However, when I went looking for resources I found a ton for other types of classes, particularly English Language Arts, but really had a hard time finding resources or examples for world language/ELL settings. There are many, many excellent books and blog posts (see: Jesse Stommel’s “Ungrading: A Bibliography” or check out the references on this post) about going gradeless/ungrading, but they are not specific to language teaching. Here’s a sample of the few that I did find:

 If you want to learn more about ungrading you can also check out these podcasts (in addition to my interview with Jessica Zeller):

  • Teachers Going Gradeless Podcast (no featured language teacher, but maybe in the future?)

  • Overthrowing Education’s episode “Starr Sackstein: How to Go Gradeless and Assess Better” (again, not specific to languages, but I’m a fan of the podcast!)

  • Teachers on Fire’s GOING GRADELESS: Katelynn Giordano, Deanna Lough, Jeffery Frieden, Aaron Blackwelder, & Abby French (and it continues… not specific to languages but super interesting, AND pinged on my search term for “French”)

  • Lesson: Impossible’s episode with Katelynn Giordano (also featured above)

 

Have you gone to, or ever considered going to, an ungrading model? Do you have any language-learning ungrading resources to share? Feel free to comment below about your experiences!

5-Minute Differentiation Strategies

Your language-teaching mission, should you choose to accept it, is to make small changes to your language lessons in order to support all of your learners.

Screen Shot 2021-10-14 at 9.12.36 PM.png

On the Lesson: Impossible podcast this week I’m talking with Drew Thompson about supporting neurodiverse learners. In honor of his sharing his perspective and tips for supporting diverse students, I thought I’d share the strategies that I try to use in my language classroom, most of which can be implemented in less than 5 minutes!

We know that each of our students have strengths and weaknesses that we need to adapt to, but differentiation can seem overwhelming, no matter how long you’ve been teaching. The idea of reaching each individual learner seems like an incredibly time-consuming pursuit: if it takes me X hours to craft a lesson, does not mean I need 30 times that amount to sufficiently plan for my 30 students? However, the good news is that there are a TON of ways that you can make your lessons more accessible, and most of them can take less than 5 minutes to prep. A colleague and I developed this list of small adaptations in 2016, and I taped it on my desk. Before each lesson I’d run my eyes down the below questions and see what I could do to make one or two changes to what I had planned. In my opinion, that’s the key: if you try to change everything at once, you’ll get overwhelmed quickly and it will feel impossible. However, adding one or two tools to your teacher toolbox at a time is doable!

These questions are meant to be for all subject matters, though the examples below are specifically for language teachers. Feel free to share with any colleagues you think might benefit!

RESOURCE DOWNLOAD AS PDF: Quick & Easy Strategies for Differentiation

Examples:

Example of a quick check for understanding: If I have time, or I’m covering a really important concept, I like to use CSI (Color, Symbol, Image) , which is explained in more detail in this post.

Example of a reference guide: It can be as simple as a hand-out with verb conjugations or as complex as a guide on how to be better communicators (see post on the TALK Strategy)

Example of self-differentiated learning targets: In order to practice their use of the future tense, I have a fun, easy “Game of Life” that students can play in small groups. When we play, I’ll put up a slide that outlines my expectations for ALL, for SOME, and for only a FEW students:

Let me know in the comments what strategies you use and if they should be added to list!